Any system that will crumble if people are immoral will crumble

Any large system must count on nobody being able to crack it, even if they want to instead of counting on people not wanting to crack it due to morality.

That is why your card has pin. So that even if immoral person find your cards they cannot steal your money.

That is why Bitcoin has many encryption. So immoral people can’t steal your Bitcoin. Imagine if Bitcoin counts on morality, like liberty dollars counting on government being moral enough not to seize gold. Then government will just seize the gold.

That is why your doors have locks. So even if people want to grab your stuffs they can’t because it’s difficult.

The less you count on moral and the more you count on good uncrackable systemt the more successful you are.

This is why marriage fails. Marriage requires love and respect and whatever. Women that backstab her husband got rich. So marriage fails a lot. It’s designed to fail.

The only system that works for anything is making it explicitly transactional, making it cheating proof, and make sure that both sides know that they can’t cheat profitably and that the knowledge is common knowledge.

Marriage fails those common sense defined.

Any cracks and the whole system will crumble and is unreliable.

Before you engage in any relationship with anyone ask yourself. Am I trusting this person? Is trust necessary for relationship to work? If so, then it won’t work.

Pure ancaps maybe as impractical as communism.yet most benefits of ancapnistan can be gotten through network of private cities.

Right of the bat I know that anything requiring moral will not work.

Why?

100 th monkey. Even if 99 people are moral, if just one guy is immoral and profit from it, the whole system crumble.

Most humans are actually immoral. That 100 th monkey is actually 80 percent. That is true no matter what your moral system is. If you are libertarians, then you know 80 percent of people aren’t libertarians. Many are extreme anti libertarians. They will oppose freedom even if it profits them.

For example many communists do not mind they are poorer if the rich are poorer too out of envy and those people, if live among us, can either vote or terrorize.

Many Muslims would rather kill anyone drawing Muhamad cartoon instead of economic progress.

In fact, democracy has a point to a certain extent. If someone has power over community, might as well let them vote. That way you avoid civil war.

If people can profitably be parasitic, others will see that the immoral one is profited and follow. Also the fact that it’s possible to take advantage of the system immorally itself means the system is unfair, which is a moral flaws.

This is why we have cradle to grave welfare recipients.

Adverse selection. If a system can be abused, if people can take advantage of it immorally, you will attract parasites.

Insurance industry go the extra miles making sure that those with prior can’t get in without higher rate.

Christians and feminists go the extra mile convincing that those who sell sex actually lose. Feminists will call the one buying incel and the women selling exploited. Any different of opinions are censored under pretext of misogynistic.

The truth is consensual transactions are economically optimal and explicit transactions are simply way more consensual because people explicitly agreed to terms of deals.

Alimony is not very consensual. People agree to get married not expecting it will happen. Pay for sex is consensual. Both sides know what they get and what they offer pretty explicitly.

The same way ancapnistan will need ways to keep economic parasites out. That means borders. That means not ancapnistan.

Of course what’s moral is often vague and subjective where what we think is moral differ from one person to another.

That is why a good system don’t count on morality.