Do you ever see that what people believe is not true and don’t fit observation, you have alternative theories, that fit your observation but no body believes you?

And you’re in a dilemma. If you explain too fast, people think you are pulling shit out of your ass.

If you explain slowly like this, people don’t get your point.

So let me just explain fast. If you want detail why I think my theory is correct, you can ask for detail.

Governments want to prevent rich people from having children.

Governments want poor people to have many children and get rich men to pay for those poor people.

Why?

Deductively it’s likely. Most people are poor so they vote for this.

Empirically just observed.

Welfare is incentive to produce children.

Yet if rich people have children we have transactional complexity.

Purpose of child support laws is to make sex and reproduction expensive for the rich with minimum benefit for the child and minimum benefit for women to pick that rich men.

Anyone agree or disagree?

Just came up with your own theory that explain observation more.

Oh ya, don’t get married if you’re rich.

Whatever shit government want to do they can do it more if they can show you consent to it.

That’s a sample.