How can anti racism policies evolve into de facto racism against whites, asians and men?

DEI is de facto racism against white asians and men nowadays. Say you are not an ancap and think that you just want to minimize racism through laws. How would you do it.

It starts with reasonable premise.

When a business do business with government it can’t be racist.

That’s pretty reasonable. Government businesses are supposedly neutral and pick only contractors that provide the best price. If that’s not the rule, if some race dominate government, that race can pick racist businesses.

The thing is, if government businesses are not a lot, this isn’t a problem. The thing is governments do businesses with pretty much everyone and every universities. So the scope of laws become huge.

Then what? Okay, companies can’t be racist. But what about companies that circumvent that by requiring traits that correlate strongly with race.

In Malaysia, many jobs require people to be able to speak Mandarin even though Mandarin language is not used for the job. Why? Chinese want to hire fellow chinese.

So government make another rule. If your hiring criteria is disproportionally affecting certain minorities you need to be able to explain that in court.

And that when things start going south.

Take IQ tests for example. IQ is a very strong PREDICTOR for job performance, especially in programming and anything that requires brain. This is important. Pick any jobs feminists or leftists complain that their bases are under represented. All requires high IQ.

Feminists, do not complain that women make more money in only fans or that there are more garbage men. They complain that women are under represented are high paying jobs that require IQ like programmers, CEO, businessmen and so on.

You can replace IQ with standardized tests and the issue remains. How do you convince juries that those that score higher in those standardized tests will indeed do better jobs.

The next part is opinion manipulation. Different race and different genders do not have the same IQ.

Most people think all races have equal IQ. Any opinions suggesting otherwise is deemed offensive by liberal.

So liberals usually insist that one or all of these is true

1. IQ doesn’t matter

2. All races and gender have equal IQ

Think about it. If IQ doesn’t matter OR all races have equal IQ and somehow top programmers are either Asians or whites, what would jury think?

Jury would think the company is racist.

So why don’t we just use freedom of speech to explain that IQ varies by race and gender. Number of guys with IQ above 140, for example, outnumber women by 10 to 1. Also there are traits that also correlate with gender and race that affect income.

A man can concentrate on one career for the whole of their life. A woman that wants to have children got to get pregnant once in a while.

So quite obviously any man that pursue a business or pursue a career will have more productivity than women.

Again, as usual, any mention of this is deemed racist/sexist misogynists and so on.

So what do companies do?

They discriminate against men, whites, and asians. That way they don’t have to explain why they are hiring more men.

Each lawsuits of anti discrimination can cost millions.

But recently whites also sue for anti discrimination. One woman got $20 million for being fired due to her race.

So finally we no longer have free market deciding who gets hired, we have laws and lawsuits deciding that.

What would be the solution?

1. Don’t care about race at all? Freedom of association? But what about those doing business with government?

2. Ancap. Again, don’t care at all about race. Freedom of association.

3. For profit moldbug joint stock government as a business. Now most voters and rulers have incentives to be correct too and realize it’s simply not profitable to bicker about rich. Those voters will tend to pick rules that minimize problems rather than exaggerating it.