Why I promoted transactional sex and hate marriage?
Why do I like promoting sex work? What does that have anything to do with libertarianism?
And why I hate marriage so much?
Libertarians want everything to be consensual and to a lesser extent meritocratic. Both go hand in hand. When things are traded consensually those who can offer more get more.
Commies hate meritocracy and that is why we fundamentally disagree with them. That is why they hate free trades. When it come to sex even conservatives hate trades for the same reason with commies. People hate meritocracy and competition when they’re not winning.
I believe that the MOST consensual things in the world are small explicitly agreed repeatedly done transactions. Second best is slightly bigger transactions enforceable by cost effective for profit private parties pimp.
That’s how I got most of my stuffs actually. I buy things from Tokopedia which is a pimp between me and those selling rubik cube for example. Here, aliexpress, eBay, and Tokopedia is effectively a pimp.
Government is also a pimp. Enforcing contract is a pimping action. Government is such a bad pimp. Litigation is expensive. Voters are bigots. Too many problems. Interestingly government do quite well pimping business. Recently Elon don’t get $42 billion due to Delaware Court decission and looks like I got to change my mind again.
The problem with government is it doesn’t specialize in pimping like eBay and Uber and government interests are not properly aligned with traders but I am straying too far here.
Transactions tend to be meritocratic. Prettier women got more money for her and her children. Richer men get more women and prettier women.
Hell, I wish war are replaced by bidding wars. If Israel get land by bidding war from Palestinians I will be pro Zionist.
If we kill commies like Chiang Kai Sek and Suharto we are as evil as commies. Just like Israel bombing Gaza. Who knows who are the assholes? But if we just reduce our taxes and outbreed the commies that means capitalism win without war and violent.
Of course, if transactions are small enough and split into smaller deals you won’t even need a pimp. The cost of backstabbing will be less. You just leave and move on to other women.
What about other consensual transactions. Say I borrow $1 million dollar from you. Then I don’t pay. Then you take out a pound of flesh. Is this consensual?
The borrowing is consensual. The demanding payment afterward cannot be consensual. If I don’t have to pay that means it’s not really a loan but more of a tips. If I have to pay and don’t then it’s a fraud effectively at least.
Large vague transactions tend to go wrong. If we misunderstand what the deal is, is this even motr consensual?
Libertarianism isn’t just moral. It’s practical. We avoid problems, conflicts and violent.
With small deals if we no longer consent we leave peacefully.
When deals are explicit and repeated both know what they are getting. That seems to match with the idea of consent to me.
Marriage violates all those principles. It’s one big deal that are vague enforced by government with alimony and shit. In a sense people don’t consent to marry. They are defrauded and tricked into it and forced.
If you have a large deals like marriage, split that into smaller deals. Pay per fuck. Pay per kids. It’s more stable than marriage.
But there is one other reason why I like to bash marriage so much.
Out of all agressions in the world the one easiest to destroy is fraud.
I can say tax is theft but I can’t save too many people that way.
Sure tax is theft but you go to jail if you don’t pay.
But monogamy is enforced by lies more than force.
The true purpose of monogamy is to ration females to incels. It has nothing to do with women’s dignity or anything. Most women will simply be better off picking rich guys to have children with. More money for her richer children.
Monogamy is worse than communism. With communism parasites eat but don’t reproduce. With monogamy many dumb stupid men and ugly women reproduce and vote for more monogamy.
Why don’t we have more Elon, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Einstein? Because they each have only one wife and few children. Elon got 10 but that’s rookie number. He can have more.
Why would men waste huge chunk of his wealth paying alimony and child support if a fraction of that amount can get him 5-10 prettier women and more children? Because those men are victims of fraud and force. Agressions. Because there are laws getting in the way of rich men producing more children.
See feminism? Why do they insist women work instead of selling sex? Because they cannot make a lot of money selling sex. Why? Because they’re ugly. Ugly women have to work. Pretty women normally don’t have to.
Everything else that says otherwise is a lie. Check evolutionary psychology.
Government can’t really force women to not share richer smarter men. Nor can government force men from having many women.
In tinder and in sugar relationship its normal for women to simply get far richer men and for men to have many women.
There is not much government can do to prevent that.
So showing the world that marriage is shit means people don’t get married anymore. Children will have richer father. Most voters will be rich capitalists that will want more capitalism.
I see this as communism achiless heel.
Promote commercialization of sex and reproduction and communists will crumble.
The other area where I am being anal is promoting commercialization and privatization of government itself.
More capitalism
Why is this not libertarian?
submitted by /u/CauliflowerBig3133
[link] [comments]
