Here is a table of content with some texts I compiled which demonstrate that price deflation, when caused by increased efficiency in production and distribution, which central banks’ 2% price inflation goals literally PREVENT, is unambiguously desirable.
Table of content
- “But The Experts™ think that price deflation is bad!”
- The inflation and deflation terms have been revised by the Keynesian revolution to sow confusion
- “Price Inflation” vs “Price Deflation” corresponds to “Impoverishment” vs “Enrichment”, by definition
- Why price deflation is just unambigiously good; 1$ for 1 year’s worth of food as an implication of high durable non-price-fixing price deflation caused by increased efficiency in production and in distribution
- “But how can 1$ for 1 year’s worth of food be a viable business model?”-litmus test of whether someone has understood the implications of natural price deflation
- Price deflation is a preferable metric to how an economy is going than GDP
- The 2% price inflation goal is consequently unambigiously undesirable. 2% price inflation is just impoverishment.
- The mechanics of a firm partaking in price deflation; how one can derive profits in a price deflation environment
- The good counter argument against price deflation goal-setting. Maybe ‘productivity’ is a better metric
- The lies regarding price deflation
- “But without inflation, people would stop consuming”, or Price deflation does not cause recessions; correlation does not equal causation
- ‘But the Great Depression was preceded by price deflation!’ This is a patently false statement
- “Muh Japan long duration of price deflation during the so-called ‘Lost Decades'”
- These two come as a result of people don’t understanding the meaning of “ceteris paribus”. Price inflation/deflation merely set the general price level in the economy – it doesn’t inherently have to lead to the latter two changing as a consequence.
submitted by /u/Derpballz
[link] [comments]
Like
0
Liked
Liked