Two people have children. The financially responsible ones face complex rules. The financially irresponsible ones face simpler rules
 |
Two people want to have children. One is financially responsible. He got rich first before knocking up somebody. He also got a financially responsible woman that pick someone rich. Another is welfare parasites with a financially irresponsible woman that pick the poor as father. The welfare parasites have children easily. Just have children. But he has no money. Sure. Governments pay for it. That’s it. The financially responsible ones? You have this absurd laws that use a man’s money to give incentives for women to leave him and take away his children. The richer the guy, the more incentive she has to leave. But many women would want to share him for far less than $55k a month per child? Can’t they just sign a contract? Nope. Not enforceable. Can they make their own deals. Nope. A woman has an inalienable right to backstab her man. She can’t relinquish that right by contract. Any woman can have sex with a rich man and cry rape latter. With contract there is an easy way to see which women will do what. Sign a contract. A woman that will backstab you will sign a contract not to backstab you, a woman that will will not sign a contract. You pick the one that agree before hand not to backstab you. Such contract is unenforceable. Government loves backstabbing. The system is designed so women backstab rich men. The more you agree to let government have power over you and the more financially responsible you are, the more incentive she will have to backstab you. Get married and now she got alimony. That’s precisely those issue. Government wants women to aim for poorer guys. Welfare is a very easy problems to solve. Let rich men pay sex and let future parents decide amount of child support. Soon, very few will still be born poor. submitted by /u/Confident-Cupcake164 |
